Standard and Expanded Notation

Filed under: math education; Author: Brian; Posted: June 19, 2008 at 10:04 pm;

If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

 
A mom recently wrote in to ask this question about standard and expanded notation.

    “How do you know when you are writing in standard form, expanded form? For example, is the expanded for of 30,048

    30000 + 40 + 8 ?

    Or for 29,486, the expanded form = 20000 + 9000 + 400 + 80 + 6 ?”

Professor Homunculus replies:

Precisely! Oddly enough, though, there seems to be no “standard” for “expanded.” What I mean is, for 30,048 the expanded form could also be considered:

    3(10,000) + 4(10) + 8(1)

    as well as

    3(104) + 4(101) + 8(100).

To make it even more confusing, some teachers might require you to include the empty columns. That would mean they might require you to write:

    30000 + 0 + 0 + 40 + 8

    or

    3(10,000) + 0(1000) + 0(100) +4 (10) + 8(1)

    or

    3(104) + 0(103) + 0(102) + 4(101) + 8(100)

Even though it seems silly to be that “complete” (I can’t imagine having to include the empty columns in “the real world”) it isn’t bad to teach it like that in order for students to get the feeling for the whole concept. It helps solidify it in one’s mind. It’s just when kids get tested on it and writing out the whole thing is required, that it gets a little ridiculous.

They may be other ways to express “expanded notation.” Of course, it depends on what one mean’s be “expanded.”

One of the problems with the way schools teach is that they usually teach you one way and imply that is the “official” way. Most often, the teachers are not even aware that they could be confusing students by not at least making them aware that there are other ways to do “standard” things.

Schools do that with many things in math, and in other subjects as well. I think that is an educational crime, because it encourages students to stop thinking and accept the narrow information they are given as the “absolute truth,” which, of course, it never is.

One thing you may want to keep in mind, is that although school lessons on “standard and expanded notation” tend to be boring and leave you with the feeling that those things are not important, and just basically fodder for tests, that is not necessarily so. To find out more about expanded notation, and why you should understand it, check out:

http://mathmojo.com/interestinglessons/expanded_notation/expanded_notation.html

There is also something called scientific notation which is often confused with expanded notation. They are not the same. For a good explanation of scientific notation, refer to:

http://www.nyu.edu/pages/mathmol/textbook/scinot.html

“Mom” also asked:

    “3205; is this number writen in standard form?”

Prof. Hunc sez:

Yes. You could also have written it with the comma, as in 3,205. (You don’t have to write the comma in the real world, but sometimes schools require it.)

Thanks for writing in. Reader input is what drives Math Mojo. Keep it coming!



Tags:

If you liked this article, please add it on Digg, del.icio.us, or StumbleUpon. It will help Math Mojo help others.

Bookmark and Share


Print This Post Print This Post

2 Comments »

  1. Comment by Mary Ann

    this was very helpful to me, i had the same question while working with my daughter’s homework! I can’t believe this site is here, I have bookmarked this site and will use it often!

  2. Comment by amrita

    i always confued in expanded notation ………..this site helped me a lot.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

(required)

(required - but will not be published)