<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math Skills versus Math Concepts (Pt. 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of MathMojo.com - helping public school, homeschooling, unschooling students, parents, teachers and adults learn math with easy and effective methods.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/#comment-85149</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/#comment-85149</guid>
		<description>In my class I always attempt to teach the concept first.  This is largely a result of how I learn math myself.  I am not a rote learner, I learn a concept and then apply it to problems.  However, I don't think it can be discounted that students learn differently.  My wife (much smarter than me) tends to be a rote learner first.  She would want all the information about the kids first and then she would use that information to put the puzzle together of who is who.  Me, I would gain nothing from the initial information.  

Basically, I think both are required in a positive math classroom.  I like to use scaffolding to inroduce a concept, but I always, at some point, will give the students a very specific set of procedures and &lt;em&gt;rules for solving a problem.  The best thing that can happen is for the students to understand the concept and then have them lay out the logical procedure for me(with a little guidance from me of course).  

If I had to choose I think a student needs the concept more than the skill.  Mainly because when a student understands a concept it has more staying power than when he has memorized a skill/procedure.

&lt;strong&gt;Professor Homunculus sez:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Right on, Trent! That is basically how I feel, as well. By the way, readers, Trent has his own very good websites, one about &lt;a href="http://www.teachingandlearningmath.blogspot.com/" target="blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Teaching and Learning Math&lt;/a&gt; and another about &lt;a href="http://www.how2teachmath.com/" target="blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to Teach Math&lt;/a&gt;, which covers algebra to pre-calculus. They look very good. Check 'em out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my class I always attempt to teach the concept first.  This is largely a result of how I learn math myself.  I am not a rote learner, I learn a concept and then apply it to problems.  However, I don&#8217;t think it can be discounted that students learn differently.  My wife (much smarter than me) tends to be a rote learner first.  She would want all the information about the kids first and then she would use that information to put the puzzle together of who is who.  Me, I would gain nothing from the initial information.  </p>
<p>Basically, I think both are required in a positive math classroom.  I like to use scaffolding to inroduce a concept, but I always, at some point, will give the students a very specific set of procedures and <em>rules for solving a problem.  The best thing that can happen is for the students to understand the concept and then have them lay out the logical procedure for me(with a little guidance from me of course).  </p>
<p>If I had to choose I think a student needs the concept more than the skill.  Mainly because when a student understands a concept it has more staying power than when he has memorized a skill/procedure.</p>
<p><strong>Professor Homunculus sez:</strong></em></p>
<p>Right on, Trent! That is basically how I feel, as well. By the way, readers, Trent has his own very good websites, one about <a href="http://www.teachingandlearningmath.blogspot.com/" target="blank" rel="nofollow">Teaching and Learning Math</a> and another about <a href="http://www.how2teachmath.com/" target="blank" rel="nofollow">How to Teach Math</a>, which covers algebra to pre-calculus. They look very good. Check &#8216;em out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Math Mojo Chronicles &#187; &#8220;Math Wars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/#comment-83120</link>
		<dc:creator>The Math Mojo Chronicles &#187; &#8220;Math Wars&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/05/23/math-skills-versus-math-concepts/#comment-83120</guid>
		<description>[...] dolcevitaacademy, which talked a bit about something that is close to my heart, which is: should you focus on teaching concrete skills first, or rather on concepts? (I&#8217;ve blogged about that on the post about Math Skills v. Math Concepts.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dolcevitaacademy, which talked a bit about something that is close to my heart, which is: should you focus on teaching concrete skills first, or rather on concepts? (I&#8217;ve blogged about that on the post about Math Skills v. Math Concepts.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
