Crossword Puzzle Digression
If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
When I was a kid, my father introduced me to the New York Times Crossword Puzzle. Dad commuted from our house to New York City every weekday, and often rode the Long Island RailRoad. He took the puzzle every day. He solved it in pen. He also solved the cryptograms in pen. I was impressed.
He taught me some basic logic for the solution of both puzzles. I did the cryptograms for awhile, but didn’t get into the crossword puzzle until a few years ago. My wife and I try to do it every Thursday through Sunday.
You may not know this (I didn’t, until my dad tipped me off a few years ago)….
…but the NYT puzzle gets progressively harder from Mon. to Sat. then gets a little easier on Sunday. Friday and Saturday puzzles tend to be brutal. Sunday is challenging, but not so hard that you can’t relax with it.
My team-mate (my wife) and I had been stumped by a corner of the puzzle from last Friday. It was driving us nuts (who the heck is Al Leitner?). Anyway, we usually get ‘em all within a day or two, but this one was tough, so I hit the web and googled some clues. I don’t like to cheat (OK, I do, but my wife has a little more backbone than I, and she usually won’t let me look up an answer until we’ve given it a few days).
When I googled the clue “boho-chic footwear” (something I feel a certain amount of pride in not knowing), the first site listed was “Rex Parker does the NYT Crossword Puzzle.”
Rex is a puzzle-meister, who keeps a blog of exactly how he solved each clue of each NYT puzzle, a day after the puzzle comes out.
What’s cool about it, is even when you normally “cheat” and look up answers, you often don’t know why the answer is the answer (”Ugg boots?” sheesh!) But Rex gives you his reasoning behind how he came up with the answers, along with plenty of general insights into the puzzle, and some witty banter. So instead of simply cheating (googling, looking up the answers the next day in the paper, etc.), and just “getting the answer,” with Rex, you actually learn something (imagine that!)
From now on, Rex’s site will be my “go-to” site when we’re stumped. I’ll try to resist as much as I can, although it’ll be tempting to go there often.
He’s also got a noir/cool site about Vintage Paperbacks and Other Cultural Detritus at Pop Sensation
Here’s a hint about the NYT puzzle. Although it’s fun to do in the paper, we live in a rural area of NY where there’s no home-delivery of the the paper. I got tired of going into the local truckstop (three miles away) four times a week (especially on winter days) just to pay an inflated, upstate price for the Times. So we subscribe to it online now. Not the whole paper, just the puzzle. It’s only $39.95 a year.
Here’s a cool benefit of subscribing. Not only does your subscription come with Across Lite (a program you use to do the puzzle with on your computer) but you can print it out, too. We print it out on two pages, effectively making the puzzle about four to eight times larger than the one in the paper. At my age (born circa 400 a.c.e.) that is easier on the eyes, and easier to do with a partner (even if she is much younger).
If you have children, the Monday through Wednesday New York Times crossword puzzle is a good way to get them started on a life-long, fun mind-exercise.
’nuff said,
Professor Homunculus
Tags:
If you liked this article, please add it on Digg, del.icio.us, or StumbleUpon. It will help Math Mojo help others.
Print This Post


Comment by Heather
My mom was always a puzzle hound. She loved word puzzles, but I always liked “thinking” puzzles. I never considered crosswords “thinking” puzzles.. but then again I’ve never tried any hard ones. My son is addicted to those logic puzzles with the graphs. Usually those have solutions in the back that walk you through the logic if you’re stumped, and that’s why I love them too :) Maybe I’ll give crosswords another go.
Comment by Alex Yaron
Having begun doing the puzzles about four years ago, I did notice that, over time, the Monday thru Wed. puzzles got so easy they were not worth doing, and the Friday and Saturday were hard. But I would add that they were hard to the point of sometimes being downright stupid. It is not impossible to make a puzzle impossible. And that is what I think some of the people Shortz chooses shoot for, and that is not challenging, it is merely annoying. Moreover, the Friday and Saturday actually are more in the line of Trivial Pursuit than they are crossword puzzles. I do not feel that googling “the name of Laverne and Shirley’s dog’s girlfriend’s favorite color” is cheating. I could be wrong, but I find it hard to believe that the people working these xword puzzles have spent a lot of time watching Laverne and Shirley!
Professor Homunculus sez:
Alex, my wife and I feel the same way. That’s why we do a lot of the older NY Times crossword puzzles, from puzzle-books, or from the online archives. At least when they did trivia back then, it was something that would stay interesting, like: The Elder Muse for practice (not an actual example).
Trivia of classical knowledge at least stays relevant - at least in an esoteric way.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment!