<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math Puzzle - Case of the Missing Dollar(?) Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of MathMojo.com - helping public school, homeschooling, unschooling students, parents, teachers and adults learn math with easy and effective methods.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Aragonesi</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-53053</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Aragonesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/#comment-53053</guid>
		<description>Great problem--took some thought.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great problem&#8211;took some thought.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-46168</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/#comment-46168</guid>
		<description>My Dad loved these kinds of puzzles and I've known this one ever since I can remember.  So, while I can't vouch for thousands of years, I can safely say this is at least 50 years old.  I've known the answer for nearly 50 years as well.  I've also asked this puzzle several times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Dad loved these kinds of puzzles and I&#8217;ve known this one ever since I can remember.  So, while I can&#8217;t vouch for thousands of years, I can safely say this is at least 50 years old.  I&#8217;ve known the answer for nearly 50 years as well.  I&#8217;ve also asked this puzzle several times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Schooley</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-43164</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Schooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/#comment-43164</guid>
		<description>My Dear Professor,

I started to write an equation, because properly written equations can solve all counting problems, but then realized that this was pointless, because adding 2 dollars to the 27 dollars the guests paid did not reflect what happened.  They paid $27.  Period.  The $2 withheld by the bellboy did not constitute an additional $2 cost above the $27, it represented money refunded by the manager that didn't get refunded to the guests.  So the problem is $27 paid by the guests, MINUS the $2 "carrying charge" of the bellboy = $25 received by the motel's manager.  

Here's a good one:  

http://www.smart-kit.com/s283/the-missing-square-where-does-it-come-from/

Hint: Don't glibly assume something to be true from visual inspection  that is not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Dear Professor,</p>
<p>I started to write an equation, because properly written equations can solve all counting problems, but then realized that this was pointless, because adding 2 dollars to the 27 dollars the guests paid did not reflect what happened.  They paid $27.  Period.  The $2 withheld by the bellboy did not constitute an additional $2 cost above the $27, it represented money refunded by the manager that didn&#8217;t get refunded to the guests.  So the problem is $27 paid by the guests, MINUS the $2 &#8220;carrying charge&#8221; of the bellboy = $25 received by the motel&#8217;s manager.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good one:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.smart-kit.com/s283/the-missing-square-where-does-it-come-from/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smart-kit.com/s283/.....come-from/</a></p>
<p>Hint: Don&#8217;t glibly assume something to be true from visual inspection  that is not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khaled</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-41450</link>
		<dc:creator>Khaled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/#comment-41450</guid>
		<description>It took me a few minutes to wrap my head around this one. I won't put up a solution, but I'll say that I'm quite impressed.

This is a cool problem. It confused me simply because I began tackling it with the assumption that everything stated in the problem text was entirely accurate. Interesting how, once you assume that you can implicitly trust a given source, you can be led through any logic, or illogic, and have a lot of trouble pulling yourself back to a critical mindset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me a few minutes to wrap my head around this one. I won&#8217;t put up a solution, but I&#8217;ll say that I&#8217;m quite impressed.</p>
<p>This is a cool problem. It confused me simply because I began tackling it with the assumption that everything stated in the problem text was entirely accurate. Interesting how, once you assume that you can implicitly trust a given source, you can be led through any logic, or illogic, and have a lot of trouble pulling yourself back to a critical mindset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karkuskwak</title>
		<link>http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/comment-page-1/#comment-41175</link>
		<dc:creator>Karkuskwak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathmojo.com/chronicles/2008/02/10/math-puzzle-case-of-the-missing-dollar/#comment-41175</guid>
		<description>Haha, it's weird that you don't think about it right away!  I' must have stared at the screen for a good 5 mins trying to figure this out!  But when you think of it, it's simple.  They give $30.  They each get back 3 bucks, they've therefore only payed $27 total.  The confusing part is that the guy gives $5 to the bellboy instead of $3.  So, 9+9+9 = 27. 27+5 = 32!   I felt stupid when is realised how simple it was. First time I came across it by the way.

Professor Homunculus sez:

At first glance this answer may look confusing. It was submitted as the answer to the way the question was originally worded here at the Math Mojo Chronicles. It's a bit different from the answer to the newly worded version, above, but a similar kind of thinking will solve the new version.

By the way, there are lots of ways to look at the problem to get the correct answer. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, it&#8217;s weird that you don&#8217;t think about it right away!  I&#8217; must have stared at the screen for a good 5 mins trying to figure this out!  But when you think of it, it&#8217;s simple.  They give $30.  They each get back 3 bucks, they&#8217;ve therefore only payed $27 total.  The confusing part is that the guy gives $5 to the bellboy instead of $3.  So, 9+9+9 = 27. 27+5 = 32!   I felt stupid when is realised how simple it was. First time I came across it by the way.</p>
<p>Professor Homunculus sez:</p>
<p>At first glance this answer may look confusing. It was submitted as the answer to the way the question was originally worded here at the Math Mojo Chronicles. It&#8217;s a bit different from the answer to the newly worded version, above, but a similar kind of thinking will solve the new version.</p>
<p>By the way, there are lots of ways to look at the problem to get the correct answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
